Correspondence: When an article is eligible for submission of
Correspondence, a link to the response form is available within the full-text
article. You must be a
current subscriber who has activated the online portion of your subscription
in order to send a Correspondence. Any reader can read published
Correspondence.
Correspondence to:
ARTICLES:
C. Stapf, H. Mast, R. R. Sciacca, J. H. Choi, A. V. Khaw, E. S. Connolly, J. Pile-Spellman, and J. P. Mohr
Predictors of hemorrhage in patients with untreated brain arteriovenous malformation
Neurology 2006; 66: 1350-1355
[Abstract][Full text][PDF]
I read the article by Stapf et al [1] regarding brain AVMs with great
interest.
The study found that infratentorial AVM location was associated with
hemorrhage at presentation in the univariate model but not the
multivariate
model (odds ratio [OR] 1.53, 95% CI 0.84 to 2.79; p = 0.17), suggesting
that
infratentorial AVM is not an independent predictor of hemorrhage at
presentation.
However, in an earlier publication from the same group [2] analyzing
essentially the same population (623 patients instead of 622),
infratentorial
AVM location was associated with hemorrhagic presentation in the
univariate
model and multivariate model (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.69; p = 0.03).
This
finding was the major conclusion.
I am curious about the discrepancy between these two reports
regarding the
association of infratentorial brain arteriovenous malformations with
hemorrhage at initial presentation. The authors did not
provide
an explanation nor cite their previous study.
References
1. Stapf, C, Mast, H, Sciacca, RR, et al. Predictors of hemorrhage in
patients
with untreated brain arteriovenous malformation. Neurology 2006; 66:1350.
2. Khaw, AV, Mohr, JP, Sciacca, RR, et al. Association of
infratentorial brain
arteriovenous malformations with hemorrhage at initial presentation.
Stroke
2004; 35:660.
Disclosure: The author reports no conflict of interest.
Reply from the Authors
12 September 2006
Christian Stapf, Stroke Center/The Neurological Institute, Columbia University 710 W 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, J.P.Mohr
cstapf{at}neuro.columbia.edu Christian Stapf, et al.
The authors thank Dr. Dashe for his interest in our work. He refers to one of our prior analyses [2] which was based on initial
presentation data only and included a limited number of morphological
variables. At the time, we concluded that "no immediate treatment
recommendations can be derived from our data", mainly "because our cross-
sectional study did not analyze the effect of infratentorial AVM location
on the risk of future hemorrhage."
Two years later, this careful interpretation has proven accurate in
the light of our most recent study. [1] The current analysis was based on
a prospective follow-up cohort and included an extended set of clinical
and morphological variables such as borderzone and deep AVM location. The
latter attenuated the effect of infratentorial AVM location on initial AVM
rupture in the multivariate logistic regression model, and no further
association was seen between infratentorial AVM location and the risk of
hemorrhage on follow-up. This statistical detail appeared less
important to us, but the finding lends support to far broader conclusions
regarding prior AVM risk models, namely that many factors showing positive
(associated arterial aneurysms, infratentorial AVM location) or negative
associations (increasing AVM size, borderzone location) with initial AVM
rupture do not necessarily predict hemorrhage on follow-up.
Based on these results, we advocate a general amnesty for studies
evaluating variables associated with hemorrhagic AVM presentation only, as
no longitudinal risk predictions can be drawn from post hoc associations
with a single event. Based on our prospective follow-up data, the Columbia
AVM Risk model only confirmed increasing age, deep AVM location, exclusive
deep venous drainage, and initial AVM rupture as being independent risk
factors for subsequent hemorrhage events in untreated patients.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.