We read with interest the article by Kumar et al and compliment the authors for their thorough
review on the subject. [1] In the legend to Figure 1H, the authors state that hemosiderin deposition is present along the nerve roots of the cauda equina. We are
not convinced that the signal intensity of the roots is low enough to
demonstrate presence of hemosiderin.
We have never seen MRI signs of
siderosis on the nerve roots [2] even recently. As mentioned in the
article, hemosiderin deposition can occur on the first and second cranial
nerves, that are part of the central nervous system (CNS), and on the 8th
cranial nerve because in this nerve the transition from central to
peripheral myelin occurs even more than 1 cm away from the brainstem.
In
all other cranial nerves, the transition is within 1 or 2 mm, as occurs
along the nerve roots entering or exiting the spinal cord. [3] Koeppen et al offered the explanation in several papers: the
development of superficial siderosis requires an active process by the CNS
glial cells, and therefore only occurs where there is central myelin. The
ferritin repressor protein present in microglia, Bergmann glia and
astrocytes promotes conversion of heme to ferritin and hemosiderin
resulting in damage to the nervous tissue, perhaps through iron-catalyzed
lipid peroxidation. [3,4] The phenomenon of superficial siderosis does not
occur on peripheral myelin formed by the Schwann cells.
In their seminal
paper, Koeppen and Dentinger [3] state that "spinal roots were iron-negative
and devoid of stainable ferritin". The best illustration of the "white"
aspect of the nerve roots contrasting the dark spinal cord was presented
by Friede in his book on developmental neuropathology and more recently
reported with permission by us. [5]
If siderosis of the cauda equina is now allegedly demonstrated by
MRI, superficial siderosis would involve not only the CNS but also the
peripheral nervous system. Therefore, we should hypothesize a new,
different mechanism that might lead to deposition of hemosiderin on the
peripheral myelin of the nerve roots of the cauda equina. Do the authors
have an explanation or hypothesis in support for such a pathogenetic
mechanism?
Lastly, on Figure 2G, we do not recognize any vessel on the
anterior surface of the spinal cord. The line indicated by the arrows is
probably the anterior dural sheet.
References
1. Kumar N, Cohen-Gadol AA, Wright RA, Miller GM, Piepgras DG, Ahlskog JE.
Superficial siderosis. Neurology 2006;66:1144-1152.
2. Bracchi M, Savoiardo M, Triulzi F, et al. Superficial siderosis of the
CNS: MR diagnosis and clinical findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993;14:227
-236.
3. Koeppen AH, Dentinger MP. Brain hemosiderin and superficial siderosis
of the central nervous system. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1988;47:249-270.
4. Koeppen AH, Dickson AC, Chu RC, Thach RE. he pathogenesis of
superficial siderosis of the central nervous system. Ann Neurol
1993;34:646-653.
5. Savoiardo M, Grisoli M, Pareyson D. Polyradiculopathy in the corse of
superficial siderosis of the CNS. J Neurol 2001;248:1099-1100.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.