Correspondence: When an article is eligible for submission of
Correspondence, a link to the response form is available within the full-text
article. You must be a
current subscriber who has activated the online portion of your subscription
in order to send a Correspondence. Any reader can read published
Correspondence.
Correspondence to:
ARTICLES:
P. Kaufmann, K. Engelstad, Y. Wei, S. Jhung, M. C. Sano, D. C. Shungu, W. S. Millar, X. Hong, C. L. Gooch, X. Mao, J. M. Pascual, M. Hirano, P. W. Stacpoole, S. DiMauro, and D. C. De Vivo
Dichloroacetate causes toxic neuropathy in MELAS: A randomized, controlled clinical trial
Neurology 2006; 66: 324-330
[Abstract][Full text][PDF]
irina.anselm{at}childrens.harvard.edu Irina A. Anselm, et al.
We read the report by Kaufmann et al with interest.[1] The
investigators studied the efficacy of dichloroacetate (DCA) in the
treatment of 30 patients with mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy,
lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes (MELAS). At a DCA dose of 25
mg/kg/day, they detected no therapeutic benefit and documented peripheral
nerve toxicity resulting in premature study termination. They conclude
that peripheral nerve toxicity overshadows any potential benefit from DCA
in patients harboring the A3243G mutation.
The high rate of DCA-induced peripheral neuropathy in the Kaufmann
study was unexpected because previous studies in a sample of 97 patients
with congenital lactic acidosis (including 10 MELAS patients) did not
reveal a high incidence of peripheral nerve toxicity. [2, 3] The new
information raises the possibility that patients with MELAS with the
A3243G mutation are exceptionally susceptible to DCA toxicity, with
diabetes mellitus potentially being a contributing factor.
During the last 12 years, on a compassionate basis we treat patients
with chronic lactic acidosis with DCA using an IRB-approved protocol. Of
13 enrolled patients with cerebral lactic acidosis, peripheral lactic
acidosis, or both, three had MELAS and harbored the A3243G mutation, but
one of these was taken off DCA due to noncompliance. The other two
patients with MELAS are still actively enrolled in the protocol and have
taken DCA for 7 and 9 years. Both patients developed moderate to severe
axonal length-dependent sensorimotor neuropathy manifested primarily as
distal weakness in lower extremities.
Ten patients enrolled in our DCA protocol had lactic acidosis due to
various metabolic disorders [Leigh syndrome, Kearns-Sayre syndrome (KSS),
pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency, pyruvate carboxylase deficiency, and
single or multiple oxidative phosphorylation defects detected
enzymatically in biopsied skeletal muscle]. Immediately after starting
DCA, a single patient with KSS developed subjective symptoms of peripheral
neuropathy with severe extremity pain and numbness, and DCA was
discontinued. The remaining nine patients, some treated with DCA at a dose of
25-50 mg/kg/day for as long as 12 years, show no clinical or
electrophysiological evidence of peripheral neuropathy. Per protocol, all
patients are followed closely clinically and with nerve conduction studies
every 6-12 months.
Despite the small size of our patient sample, our findings seem to confirm the conclusion reached by Kaufmann et al that DCA
causes toxic neuropathy in patients with MELAS. We are about to resubmit
our DCA study protocol to the Children’s Hospital Boston IRB for renewal
and will include in the application the findings of the Kaufmann et al
study. We are wondering, however, whether the MELAS A3243G patients
should be excluded from receiving DCA treatment or be assessed on
a case-by-case basis. Since a correlation exists between cerebral lactic
acidosis and neurologic impairment in MELAS [4], would it be advisable to
enroll selected MELAS patients with severe cerebral lactic acidosis?
References
1. Kaufmann P, Engelstad K, Wei Y, et
al. Dichloroacetate causes toxic neuropathy in MELAS: a randomized,
controlled clinical trial. Neurology 2006;66:324-330.
2. Stacpoole PW, Barnes CL, Hurbanis MD, Cannon SL, Kerr DS.
Treatment of congenital lactic acidosis with dichloroacetate. Arch Dis
Child 1997;77:535-541.
3. Stacpoole PW, Perkins LA, Neiberger NE, Theriaque DW, Hutson AD.
Dichloroacetate treatment of congenital lactic acidosis: preliminary
outcome results of the DCA/CLA clinical trial (abstr). Presented at the
84th annual meeting of The Endocrine Society; San Francisco, CA; June
2002.
4. Kaufmann P, Shungu DC, Sano MC, et
al. Cerebral lactic acidosis correlates with neurological impairment in
MELAS. Neurology 2004;62:1297-1302.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Reply from the Authors
6 June 2006
Petra Kaufmann, Columbia University 710 W 168th Street, New York NY 10032, Darryl DeVivo
We thank Drs. Anselm and Darras for their comments and agree that
MELAS 3243 patients may have an underlying vulnerability of the peripheral
nervous system making them particularly susceptible to dichloroacetate
toxicity. Due to this toxicity, we could not evaluate for any possible
benefit in our study. Discerning drug effects from the natural history of
metabolic disease can be challenging without concurrent controls.
Therefore, we agree that if dichloroacetate is used, patients should be
monitored very closely, both electrophysiologically and clinically, for
signs of peripheral neuropathy.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Dichloroacetate causes toxic neuropathy in MELAS: A randomized, controlled clinical trial
28 March 2006
Heikki Savolainen, Department of Occupational Safety and Health POB 536, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
This careful investigation by Kaufmann et al [1] shows that decreasing the lactate anion concentration does not ameliorate the nervous system's biochemical complications. It may be due to the toxicity of the treatment as Kaufmann et al suggest or because the inhibition of lactate accumulation does not necessarily correct the acidosis caused by excessive protons for malfunctioning respiratory chain.
Acidosis in itself is an important factor in formic acid toxicity [2] and circulating anions from the tricarboxylic acid cycle [3] may have important regulatory effects, such as upregulation of hypoxia inducible factor (HIF-1). [4] It seems that treating the acidosis is even more important than trying to remove only the lactate anions.
References
1. Kaufmann P, Engelstad K, Wei Y, et al. Dichloroacetate causes toxic neuropathy in
MELAS. Neurology 2006;66:324-330.
2. Liesivuori J, Savolainen H. Methanol and formic acid toxicity: Biochemical mechanisms. Pharmacol Toxicol 1991;69:157-163.
3. Forni LG, McKinnon W, Lord GA, Treacher DF, Peron J-MR, Hilton PJ. Circulating anions usually associated with the Krebs cycle in patients with metabolic acidosis. Crit Care 2005;9:R591-R595.
4. Brière JJ, Favier J, Benit P, et al. Mitochondrial succinate is instrumental for HIF 1 alpha nuclear translocation in SDHA-mutant fibroblasts under normoxic conditions. Hum Mol Genet 2005;14:3263-3269.
Disclosure: The author reports no conflicts of interest.
Reply from the authors
28 March 2006
Petra Kaufmann, Columbia University 710 W 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, Darryl C. De Vivo
We thank Dr. Savolainen for his comments. DCA did not lower lactate
under the conditions of our trial. [1] Therefore, our study does not
allow conclusions on the clinical effects of lowering lactate in MELAS.
We have previously shown that elevated brain lactate is associated with
neurological impairment [5] and we maintain that lowering lactate may be
beneficial in MELAS. We presume that elevated brain lactate is associated
with acidosis, but this is not proven. Dr. Savolainen’s hypothesis that lowering lactate may not correct acidosis cannot be evaluated on the basis
of our data. We concur that chronic cerebral acidosis is disadvantageous
to brain cells, but low brain pH has to be documented in MELAS.
References
5. Kaufmann P, Shungu DC, Sano MC, et al. Cerebral lactic acidosis correlates with neurological impairment in MELAS. Neurology 2004;62:1297-1302.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.