We read with interest the correspondence by Dr Morel.
We did not know about the existence of her
article so we could not have adapted our drawings from this excellent
atlas. Our review was not intended as an anatomic study. As mentioned in
the legend, the drawings are a schematic representation inspired by many other papers and anatomical books published before Dr
Morel’s work including Gray's anatomy, Nieuwenhuys’s book of anatomy, and
Jones’s book about the thalamus. [1-3]
Similarly, the vascular supply of the
thalamus was taken from many articles and textbooks. [4-6]We think that our drawings,
representing a kind of synthesis, are sufficiently different from other
work to justify the fact that we did not to cite all books and papers
about the subject.
We invite Dr. Morel to consider other scientific work in which the
thalamic nuclei are represented similarly as in their publication.
Additionally, in reviewing the literature it is clear that there is no
uniform consensus regarding blood supply and thalamic nuclei location as
well as terminology.
References
1. William PL. Gray's anatomy. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone: 1995:1085.
2. Nieuwenhuys R. The human central nervous system. A synopsis and atlas.
3rd revised Edition. New York, NY: Springer Verlag:1988:242.
3. Jones ED. Thalamus, Experimental and Clinical aspects (Vol 2). New
York, NY: Elsevier: 1997: 425-499.
4. Bogousslavsky J, Regli F, Uske A. Thalamic infarcts: clinical syndromes, etiology, and prognosis. Neurology 1988;38:837-848.
5. Tatu L, Moulin T, Bogousslavsky J, Duvernoy H. Arterial territories of
the human brain: cerebral hemispheres. Neurology 1998;50:1699-1708.
6. Von Cramon DY, Hebel N, Schuri U. A contribution to the anatomic basis of thalamic amnesia. Brain 1985;108:993-1008.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.