Neurology®
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed Neurology journal
Quick Search
Advanced Search
Published online before print July 30, 2008, doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000326213.89576.0e)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
01.wnl.0000326213.89576.0ev1
71/15/1134    most recent
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, A. D.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Received July 22, 2007
Accepted March 3, 2008

Dose comparison trial of sustained-release fampridine in multiple sclerosis

A. D. Goodman MD*, T. R. Brown MD, MPH, J. A. Cohen MD, L. B. Krupp MD, R. Schapiro MD, S. R. Schwid MD, R. Cohen MD, L. N. Marinucci MS, A. R. Blight PhD, For the Fampridine MS-F202 Study Group

From the Department of Neurology (A.D.G., S.R.S.), University of Rochester, NY; Department of Neurology (T.R.B.), Evergreen Hospital Medical Center, Seattle, WA; Department of Neurology (J.A.C.), Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH; Department of Neurology (L.K.), Stony Brook University Hospital, NY; Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology (R.S.), MN; and Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. (R.C., L.N.M., A.R.B.), Hawthorne, NY.


* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: andrew_goodman{at}urmc.rochester.edu.

Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety of three different doses of sustained-release fampridine in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Method: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study recruited 206 participants at 24 centers in the United States and Canada. After a single-blind, 2-week placebo run-in, participants were randomly assigned to receive fampridine (10, 15, or 20 mg twice daily) or placebo for 15 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was percent change in walking speed based on the timed 25-foot walk.

Results: Trends for increased walking speed were consistent across dose groups vs placebo, but not significant, on the prospective analysis. An increase from baseline in lower extremity strength during the 12-week stable-dose period was seen in the groups receiving 10- and 15-mg doses, compared with placebo (p = 0.018 and 0.003). There were no significant changes in other secondary assessments. Post hoc analysis revealed subsets of participants in each dose group with walking speeds during the treatment period that were consistently faster than during the nontreatment period. There were significantly more "consistent responders" in the drug-treated groups than in the placebo group (36.7% compared with 8.5%). Consistent responders showed significantly greater improvement in self-assessed ambulation on the 12-Item MS Walking Scale than did nonresponders. Fampridine was generally well tolerated. Severe and serious adverse events were more frequent at the highest dose.

Conclusions: This phase 2 study suggests that a subgroup of patients, when treated with fampridine, experiences a clinically relevant improvement in walking ability, which is sustained for at least 14 weeks.


Related Article

Fampridine for MS responders: Clinically relevant or hypothesis generating?
Richard J. Kryscio
Neurology 2008 71: 1130-1131. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
W. Smith, S. Swan, T. Marbury, and H. Henney III
Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Sustained-Release Fampridine (Fampridine-SR) in Healthy Volunteers and Adults With Renal Impairment
J. Clin. Pharmacol., February 1, 2010; 50(2): 151 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
R. J. Kryscio
Fampridine for MS responders: Clinically relevant or hypothesis generating?
Neurology, October 7, 2008; 71(15): 1130 - 1131.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
A. R Korenke, M. P Rivey, and D. R Allington
Sustained-Release Fampridine for Symptomatic Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis
Ann. Pharmacother., October 1, 2008; 42(10): 1458 - 1465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]