Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online before print March 19, 2008, doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000304345.14212.38)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
01.wnl.0000304345.14212.38v1
70/17/1534    most recent
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyle, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyle, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, D. A.
Received July 23, 2007
Accepted December 5, 2007

Processing resources reduce the effect of Alzheimer pathology on other cognitive systems

P. A. Boyle PhD*, R. S. Wilson PhD, J. A. Schneider MD, J. L. Bienias ScD, and D. A. Bennett MD

From Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center (P.A.B., R.S.W., J.A.S., D.A.B.), Department of Behavioral Sciences (P.A.B., R.S.W.), Department of Neurological Sciences (R.S.W., J.A.S., D.A.B.), Rush Institute for Healthy Aging (J.L.B.), and Department of Internal Medicine (J.L.B.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.


* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Patricia_Boyle{at}Rush.edu.

The cognitive abilities of older persons vary greatly, even among those with similar amounts of Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology, suggesting differences in neural reserve. Although its neurobiologic basis is not well understood, reserve may reflect differences in the ability to compensate for the deleterious effects of pathology by recruiting alternative or additional brain networks to perform a specific task. If this is an effective compensatory strategy, then involvement of additional cognitive systems may help maintain function in other cognitive systems despite the accumulation of pathology.

Objective: We tested the hypothesis that processing resources, specifically perceptual speed and working memory, modify the associations of AD pathology with other cognitive systems.

Method: A total of 103 older participants of the Rush Memory and Aging Project underwent detailed annual clinical evaluations and brain autopsy. Five cognitive systems including perceptual speed, working memory, semantic memory, visuospatial abilities, and episodic memory were assessed proximate to death, and AD pathology including tau tangles and amyloid load were quantified postmortem.

Results: In multiple regression models adjusted for age, sex, and education, processing resources reduced the associations of tangles with other cognitive systems, such that persons with higher levels of perceptual speed and working memory performed better on semantic memory and visuospatial abilities despite the burden of tangles. Perceptual speed also reduced the associations of amyloid with semantic memory, visuospatial abilities, and episodic memory.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that processing resources may help compensate for the deleterious effects of Alzheimer disease pathology on other cognitive systems in older persons.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.