|
|
||||||||
The Brooks et al. controlled clinical trial found that dextromethorphan and quinidine, compared with either drug alone, safely reduced the severity and frequency of pseudobulbar affect (pathologic laughing and crying) episodes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. They also demonstrated an improvement in quality of life related to treatment.
see page 1364
AVP-39: A successful randomized clinical trial on a supportive therapy for ALS
Commentary by Jonathan Katz, MD
Pseudobulbar affect is a term used to describe uncontrolled episodes of laughter or crying. These emotional outbursts occur in a large number of patients with ALS and can be a major problem in their interpersonal interactions.1
The above report by Brooks et al. describes a 17-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial showing that AVP-39 (a combination of 30 mg of quinidine and 30 mg of dextromethorphan) relieved emotional lability in ALS patients with pseudobulbar affect and that this relief improved quality of life and quality of relationship scales.
An important implication of the present article is that despite numerous clinical trials, few agents have been of obvious benefit for this difficult disorder. Only riluzole has been approved by the FDA for use in the United States based on two clinical trials that demonstrated a modest effect on survival in the mid-1990s.2 The AVP-39 study is also of particular interest in that it uses a double-blind, randomized trial to determine the benefit of a supportive measure, as opposed to an effect on survival. These results will allow practitioners to make specific judgments with the knowledge of what outcome measures were used, the magnitude of the benefits, and the nature of risks. Additional trials are needed for studying and comparing the benefits of other agents that may treat pseudobulbar affect and other supportive measures commonly used in ALS patients: the role of physical therapy, exercise, and respiratory failure, and medical therapies for sleep, depression, pain, excess salivation, respiratory failure, cramps, and spasticity.
Finally, a successful randomized trial such as this one should prompt us to consider some of the practical limitations of evidence-based medicine. While trials provide us with evidence that a therapy is effective, they do not give guidance on how to weigh monetary costs or make subjective judgments about the cost of side effects and the value of the clinical improvement. For example, the release of riluzole onto the market led to debate regarding its overall utility because of its high cost, the need to monitor for adverse reactions, and its relatively modest benefit.3 In the current study, patients had to be tested to determine how they metabolized dextromethorphan, 89% of patients experienced untoward side effects, and 24% discontinued therapy during the trials 4-week duration. These concerns will raise questions about AVP-39 acceptability in the context of other agents that may improve pseudobulbar affect, including amitriptyline and serotonin reuptake inhibitors, but have not yet been as carefully studied.
see page 1364
References
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. N. Hingorani, J. P. Kittrelle, and J. Katz Treatment of pseudobulbar affect in ALS: October 26 Highlight and Commentary Neurology, May 24, 2005; 64(10): 1821 - 1821. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all Correspondence
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |