|
|
||||||||
From the Department of Neurology, University Hospitals of Zürich (Drs. Kremer, Mosso, Georgiadis, Benninger, Baumgartner, and E. Stöckli) and Bern (Dr. Arnold), Switzerland.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Christine Kremer, Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Frauenklinikstr.26, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland; e-mail: christine.kremer{at}nos.usz.ch
Objective: To compare the rate of ischemic events and intracranial hemorrhage in the long-term follow-up of patients with persistent and transient severe stenosis or occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) due to spontaneous dissection (ICAD).
Methods: One hundred and sixty-one consecutive patients with unilateral ICAD causing severe stenosis or occlusion were examined clinically and by ultrasound 1 year after symptom onset. Forty-six cases with persistent and 46 age- and latency-matched cases with transient (recanalization complete or less than 50% stenosis) severe stenosis or occlusion of the ICA were enrolled. Nine patients with surgical, endovascular, or fibrinolytic therapy for ICAD or associated stroke were excluded. Antithrombotic therapy was given at the discretion of the treating physician. Clinical follow-ups were done annually.
Results: Antithrombotic therapy and follow-up were similar in patients with permanent (6.2 ± 3.4 years) and transient (7.2 ± 4.3 years) severe stenosis or occlusion of the ICA. Cases with permanent carotid stenosis or occlusion showed annual rates of 0.7% for ipsilateral carotid territory stroke and of 1.4% for any stroke. Cases with transient carotid stenosis or occlusion showed annual rates of 0.3% for ipsilateral carotid territory stroke and of 0.6% for any stroke.
Conclusions: This study suggests that ICAD has a benign long-term prognosis with low rates of ipsilateral carotid territory and any stroke and that the stroke rate in ICAD is not related to the persistence of severe carotid stenosis or occlusion. These results question the rationale of surgical or catheter-based revascularization in patients with ICAD.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Arnold, L. Kappeler, D. Georgiadis, K. Berthet, B. Keserue, M. G. Bousser, and R. W. Baumgartner Gender differences in spontaneous cervical artery dissection. Neurology, September 26, 2006; 67(6): 1050 - 1052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kadkhodayan, D. T. Jeck, C. J. Moran, C. P. Derdeyn, and D. T. Cross III Angioplasty and Stenting in Carotid Dissection with or without Associated Pseudoaneurysm AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2005; 26(9): 2328 - 2335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. de Bray and R. W. Baumgartner History of Spontaneous Dissection of the Cervical Carotid Artery Arch Neurol, July 1, 2005; 62(7): 1168 - 1170. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. Pride Jr., R. E. Replogle, G. Rappard, C. L. T. D. Graybeal, J. White, and P. Purdy Stent-Coil Treatment of a Distal Internal Carotid Artery Dissecting Pseudoaneurysm on a Redundant Loop by Use of a Flexible, Dedicated Nitinol Intracranial Stent AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2004; 25(2): 333 - 337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Cohen, R. R. Leker, M. Gotkine, M. Gomori, and T. Ben-Hur Emergent Stenting to Treat Patients With Carotid Artery Dissection: Clinically and Radiologically Directed Therapeutic Decision Making Stroke, December 1, 2003; 34 (12): e254 - e257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Beletsky, Z. Nadareishvili, J. Lynch, A. Shuaib, A. Woolfenden, and J. W. Norris Cervical Arterial Dissection: Time for a Therapeutic Trial? Stroke, December 1, 2003; 34(12): 2856 - 2860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Touze, J.-Y. Gauvrit, T. Moulin, J.-F. Meder, S. Bracard, and J.-L. Mas Risk of stroke and recurrent dissection after a cervical artery dissection: A multicenter study Neurology, November 25, 2003; 61(10): 1347 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |