Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, M. H.
Neurology 2001;57:822-826
© 2001 American Academy of Neurology


Articles

Number processing induces spatial performance biases

Martin H. Fischer, PhD

From the Department of Psychology, University of Dundee, Scotland.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Martin Fischer, Department of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland; e-mail: m.h.fischer{at}dundee.ac.uk

Background: — Response speed in parity judgments is faster with the left hand for small numbers (e.g., 1 or 2) and faster with the right hand for larger numbers (e.g., 8 or 9). This effect suggests that number processing can induce systematic spatial biases in bisection tasks.

Method: — Neurologically healthy participants bisected visually presented stimuli with a pencil. Stimuli were long strings of uniform digits (experiment 1) or lines with single digit flankers (experiment 2).

Results: — Bisection performance was biased to the left of center for strings made of digits 1 or 2 and to the right of center for strings made of digits 8 or 9. Line bisection was biased toward the flanker representing the larger magnitude, regardless of its position.

Conclusions: — These results extend previous findings and support the notion of an automatic association of number magnitudes with spatial response codes. The effect may be useful for an assessment of semantic number processing in special populations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychon Bull RevHome page
M. B. Nathan, S. Shaki, M. Salti, and D. Algom
Numbers and space: Associations and dissociations
Psychon Bull Rev, June 1, 2009; 16(3): 578 - 582.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Atten Percept PsychophysHome page
D. Fitousi, S. Shaki, and D. Algom
The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: The SNARC effect revisited
Atten Percept Psychophys, January 1, 2009; 71(1): 143 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychon Bull RevHome page
M. E. R. NICHOLLS, A. M. LOFTUS, and W. GEVERS
Look, no hands: A perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention
Psychon Bull Rev, April 1, 2008; 15(2): 413 - 418.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. Oliveri, V. Rausei, G. Koch, S. Torriero, P. Turriziani, and C. Caltagirone
Overestimation of numerical distances in the left side of space
Neurology, December 14, 2004; 63(11): 2139 - 2141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.