|
|
||||||||
From the City of Hope National Medical Center (Drs. Buzin, Feng, Yan, and Sommer), Duarte, CA; and The Ohio State University Medical Center (Drs. Mendell, Serrano, Sangani, and Prior, and C. Wall), Columbus.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jerry R. Mendell, Department of Neurology, Room 453 Means Hall, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210; e-mail: mendell.1{at}osu.edu mendell.1@osu.edu
Objective: To determine whether detection of small mutations of the dystrophin gene can be increased using an enhanced method of single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis.
Background: Usual methods of DNA analysis for Duchenne dystrophy cannot identify mutations in one-third of cases. Muscle biopsy, with its inherent risks and added liability for patients with Duchenne dystrophy, becomes the sole method of diagnosis. Even with a tissue diagnosis of dystrophin deficiency, many families are excluded from carrier detection and prenatal diagnosis.
Methods: Genomic DNA from a cohort of 93 patients with Duchenne dystrophy without identifiable gene mutations was screened for mutations. In each case, 22 kilobases of genomic DNA were scanned, including all 79 exons of the dystrophin gene, adjacent intronic regions, and six alternative exons 1.
Results: Sixty-eight (73%) had small mutations, including 34 nonsense mutations, 27 microdeletions and insertions, and 7 splice site mutations. No missense mutations were found. One nonsense mutation in exon 59 was detected in four patients. Most mutations were new; 54 of 62 different small mutations have not been reported. Mutations were found throughout the gene: 24% in the first quartile, 31% in the second, 16% in the third, and 29% in the fourth.
Conclusions: A highly sensitive single-strand conformation polymorphism method substantially increased detection of small dystrophin gene mutations and made it possible to diagnose approximately 90% of patients with Duchenne dystrophy by DNA analysis. These findings, combined with cost savings and safety issues, provide compelling reasons to consider DNA analysis as the initial diagnostic test for the suspected dystrophin-deficient patient.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Legardinier, B. Legrand, C. Raguenes-Nicol, A. Bondon, S. Hardy, C. Tascon, E. Le Rumeur, and J.-F. Hubert A Two-amino Acid Mutation Encountered in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Decreases Stability of the Rod Domain 23 (R23) Spectrin-like Repeat of Dystrophin J. Biol. Chem., March 27, 2009; 284(13): 8822 - 8832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Bobo, A. Kenneson, K. Kolor, and M. A. Brown Adherence to American Academy of Pediatrics Recommendations for Cardiac Care Among Female Carriers of Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophy Pediatrics, March 1, 2009; 123(3): e471 - e475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Disset, C.F. Bourgeois, N. Benmalek, M. Claustres, J. Stevenin, and S. Tuffery-Giraud An exon skipping-associated nonsense mutation in the dystrophin gene uncovers a complex interplay between multiple antagonistic splicing elements Hum. Mol. Genet., March 15, 2006; 15(6): 999 - 1013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Prior and S. J. Bridgeman Experience and Strategy for the Molecular Testing of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy J. Mol. Diagn., August 1, 2005; 7(3): 317 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Griggs and K. Bushby Continued need for caution in the diagnosis of Duchenne muscular dystrophy Neurology, May 10, 2005; 64(9): 1498 - 1499. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Stein, N. A. Tipnis, and P. Schultz Fatigue, Decreased Interest in Play, Motor Delay, and Elevated Liver-Function Tests in a 4-Year-Old Boy Pediatrics, November 1, 2004; 114(5/S2): 1437 - 1441. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Feng, J. Yan, C. H. Buzin, S. S. Sommer, and J. A. Towbin Comprehensive mutation scanning of the dystrophin gene in patients with nonsyndromic X-linked dilated cardiomyopathy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 18, 2002; 40(6): 1120 - 1124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Muntoni Is a muscle biopsy in Duchenne dystrophy really necessary? Neurology, August 28, 2001; 57(4): 574 - 575. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |