Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lisak, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lisak, R. P.
NEUROLOGY 1998;51:S25-S29
© 1998 American Academy of Neurology

Intravenous Immunoglobulins in Multiple Sclerosis

Robert P. Lisak, MD

From the Departments of Neurology and Immunology and Microbiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Robert P. Lisak, Department of Neurology, University Health Center, 4201 St. Antoine, Detroit, MI 48201.

Abstract.

The spectrum of diseases being treated with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) appears to be ever broadening, including use in neurologic diseases. After a period of anectodal reports and smaller uncontrolled series, recently there have been several randomized, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies employing IVIg in patients with relapsing remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis (MS). Reduction in relapse rate and some evidence of decreased MRI activity has been reported, but to date no effect on disability or MRI lesion burden has been noted. Because of differences in methodologic design and patient populations, as well as the relatively small number of patients in some of these studies, a rigorous direct comparison of efficacy with the type I interferons and glatiramer acetate is not possible. Given these data and the high cost of IVIg, routine use of this mode of therapy cannot be recommended, certainly not as a first-line treatment. Larger studies would clearly be helpful. At present there is no evidence to support the use of IVIg in secondary progressive (SP) or primary progressive (PP) MS.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.