Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poewe, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poewe, W.
NEUROLOGY 1998;51:S21-S24
© 1998 American Academy of Neurology

Should treatment of Parkinson's disease be started with a dopamine agonist?

Werner Poewe, MD

From the Department of Neurology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Werner Poewe, Department of Neurology, University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.

Abstract.

Which drugs to use when initiating pharmacotherapy in early Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex treatment decision that depends on factors such as disease severity, functional disability, and psychosocial handicap, as well as individual aspects of age, employment status, cognitive impairment, and co-morbidity. Without clear proof of a drug's capacity to markedly alter or even stop progression of the disease, there is no pharmacologic strategy that can be currently viewed as universal first-line treatment. Dopamine (DA) replacement strategies offer greatest symptomatic relief and are needed whenever there is significant functional disability. All currently available oral DA agonists have been shown to be less effective and less well tolerated than levodopa. This has also been shown in recent double-blind controlled studies for the novel agonists such as ropinirole or cabergoline, although they appear equally effective in mild disease for the first 6-12 months of therapy. Taking into account the significant difference in cost between levodopa and DA agonists, there is at present no reason to universally start DA replacement therapy with a DA agonist in most patients. Dopamine agonists remain first-line treatment only for those at particular risk for developing levodopa-induced dyskinesias, i.e., young-onset PD patients.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
G. Montouris
Importance of monotherapy in women across the reproductive cycle
Neurology, December 11, 2007; 69(24_suppl_3): S10 - S16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.