Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bortz, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bortz, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, R. S.

Neurology, Vol 45, Issue 11 2029-2034, Copyright © 1995 by American Academy of Neurology


ARTICLES

Differential response characteristics in nonepileptic and epileptic seizure patients on a test of verbal learning and memory

JJ Bortz, GP Prigatano, D Blum and RS Fisher
Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85013-4496, USA.

Investigators have found it difficult to separate patients with nonepileptic seizures (NES) from those with true epileptic seizures (ES) using quantitative measures of neuropsychological test performance. We examined qualitative response characteristics on the California Verbal Learning Test of 41 patients undergoing continuous video/audio-EEG monitoring in an effort to distinguish these patient groups (12 patients with left temporal [LT] foci, 11 with right temporal [RT] foci, and 18 with NES). NES patients explicitly recognized fewer target words compared with ES patients. In addition, NES patients rarely made false-positive errors, which resulted in failure to endorse a significant number of items on the recognition list. This response tendency is called a negative response bias. In contrast, LT patients endorsed a high number of items on the recognition test, which resulted in a positive response bias. RT patients demonstrated no consistent response tendency. In our sample, a negative response bias index (ie, a cutoff score < 0) showed a sensitivity of 61% and a specificity of 91%. We propose that failure to explicitly recognize words following repeated exposure may reflect aspects of psychological denial in NES patients. Response bias indices may thus help identify patients with NES and may begin to explain the psychological mechanisms underlying this complex disorder.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.