|
|
||||||||
Department of Neurology, The Neurological Institute, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY.
Knowledge of the natural history of certain stroke subtypes is essential for the proper analysis and interpretation of clinical trials of stroke therapy. We evaluated the degree of weakness on admission and again 7 to 10 days later in 62 patients with pure motor hemiparesis (PMH) and 280 patients with motor deficits from other stroke syndromes (OSS). During the 7-to-10-day study interval, we found that the OSS group worsened slightly in motor function, whereas the PMH group improved (p = 0.01). Among those who improved in both groups, those in the PMH group improved to a greater extent than did those in the OSS group (p = 0.02). This occurred despite a greater frequency of worsening during the first 12 hours after stroke onset in the PMH group. By the fourth day following PMH onset, a majority of patients had improved, and this improvement was sustained until day 10. The two groups did not differ significantly in age, race, sex, history of cardiac disease, hematocrit, anticoagulation treatment, blood glucose, or medical complications in hospital. Lacunar infarcts occurred in 84% of PMH and 23% of OSS. Patients with PMH show significant spontaneous improvement in weakness within 7 to 10 days of admission, compared with patients with OSS. Stratification by admission stroke syndrome in clinical trials may be necessary before judging the efficacy, or lack thereof, of a therapeutic agent.
Supported in part by NINDS R-01 NS 27517 and the Horace W. Goldsmith Foundation.
Presented in part at the 43rd annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, Boston, MA, April 1991.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ralph L. Sacco, Neurological Institute, 710 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032.
Received December 4, 1991. Accepted for publication in final form February 19, 1992.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. H. Buck, S. Starkman, M. Eckstein, C. S. Kidwell, J. Haines, R. Huang, D. Colby, and J. L. Saver Dispatcher Recognition of Stroke Using the National Academy Medical Priority Dispatch System Stroke, June 1, 2009; 40(6): 2027 - 2030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Albers, P. Amarenco, J. D. Easton, R. L. Sacco, and P. Teal Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition) Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6_suppl): 630S - 669S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Albers, P. Amarenco, J. D. Easton, R. L. Sacco, and P. Teal Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3_suppl): 483S - 512S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Arboix, I Padilla, J Massons, L Garcia-Eroles, E Comes, and C Targa Clinical study of 222 patients with pure motor stroke J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2001; 71(2): 239 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Lawrence, C. Coshall, R. Dundas, J. Stewart, A. G. Rudd, R. Howard, and C. D. A. Wolfe Estimates of the Prevalence of Acute Stroke Impairments and Disability in a Multiethnic Population Stroke, June 1, 2001; 32(6): 1279 - 1284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Hinkle A Descriptive Study of Function in Acute Motor Stroke West J Nurs Res, April 1, 2001; 23(3): 296 - 312. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. Albers, P. Amarenco, J. D. Easton, R. L. Sacco, and P. Teal Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy for Ischemic Stroke Chest, January 1, 2001; 119 (2009): 300S - 320S. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Marshall, G. M. Perera, R. M. Lazar, J. W. Krakauer, R. C. Constantine, and R. L. DeLaPaz Evolution of Cortical Activation During Recovery From Corticospinal Tract Infarction Stroke, March 1, 2000; 31(3): 656 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nagaratnam, C. Xavier, and R. Fabian Stroke Subtype--Ataxic Hemiparesis Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 1999; 13(2): 149 - 153. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Cramer, G. Nelles, J. D. Schaechter, J. D. Kaplan, and S. P. Finklestein Computerized Measurement of Motor Performance After Stroke Stroke, November 1, 1997; 28(11): 2162 - 2168. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J.P. Mohr Some Clinical Aspects of Acute Stroke : Excellence in Clinical Stroke Award Lecture Stroke, September 1, 1997; 28(9): 1835 - 1839. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nagaratnam, C. Xavier, and R. Fabian Functional Outcome of Patients with Parietal Lobe Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 1997; 11(3): 155 - 158. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Samuelsson, B. Soderfeldt, and G. B. Olsson Functional Outcome in Patients With Lacunar Infarction Stroke, May 1, 1996; 27(5): 842 - 846. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Gelber, B. Josefczyk, D. Herrman, D. C. Good, and S. J. Verhulst Comparison of Two Therapy Approaches in the Rehabilitation of the Pure Motor Hemiparetic Stroke Patient Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 1995; 9(4): 191 - 196. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |