Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bromberg, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Albers, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bromberg, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Albers, J. W.
NEUROLOGY 1992;42:1157
© 1992 American Academy of Neurology

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Comparison of patients with and without an associated monoclonal gammopathy

Mark B. Bromberg, MD, PhD, Eva L. Feldman, MD, PhD and James W. Albers, MD, PhD

Department of Neurology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI.

We reviewed our data from patients with the clinical diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Seventy patients had no demonstrable underlying disease to account for their polyneuropathy and were classified as idiopathic CIDP (CIDP-I). We detected a monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance (MGUS) in 30 patients who were classified as CIDP-MGUS;17 had an IgG gammopathy, 12 an IgM gammopathy, and one an IgA gammopathy. Compared with CIDP-I patients, CIDP-MGUS patients were older and slightly more likely to be males. When compared with patients with an MGUS but without polyneuropathy reported in the literature, CIDP-MGUS patients had similar distributions of age, sex, and immunoglobulin class. There were no significant differences in motor and sensory nerve conduction measures between CIDP-I and CIDP-MGUS patients, nor between CIDP-MGUS patients with IgM and those with IgG or IgA gammopathy. Strict electrodiagnostic criteria for primary demyelination were fulfilled by 54% of CIDP-I patients and 40% of CIDP-MGUS patients, but these were not significantly different. Our study suggests that (1) the demographic features and immunoglobulin class distribution of CIDP-MGUS patients largely reflect those of patients with an MGUS, but without polyneuropathy, (2) CIDP-MGUS patients as a group cannot be distinguished from CIDP-I patients on the basis of nerve conduction studies, and (3) IgM CIDP-MGUS patients cannot be distinguished from those with other immunoglobulin classes.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Mark B. Bromberg, Department of Neurology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Taubman Center 1920/0316, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0316.

Presented in part at the 43rd annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, Boston, MA, April 1991.

Received August 28, 1991. Accepted for publication in final form November 5, 1991.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
M P T Lunn, H Manji, P P Choudhary, R A C Hughes, and P K Thomas
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a prevalence study in south east England
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 1999; 66(5): 677 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.