Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mark, V. W.
Right arrow Articles by Heilman, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mark, V. W.
Right arrow Articles by Heilman, K. M.
NEUROLOGY 1990;40:640
© 1990 American Academy of Neurology

Bodily neglect and orientational biases in unilateral neglect syndrome and normal subjects

Victor W. Mark, MD and Kenneth M. Heilman, MD

Department of Neurology (Dr. Mark), University of Maryland, and Montebello Rehabilitation Hospital, Baltimore, MD; and the Department of Neurology (Dr. Heilman), College of Medicine, University of Florida, and the Research Service, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Gainesville, FL.

Patients with neglect erred toward the right when attempting to locate the intercepta of their midsagittal planes with a horizontal Une placed in front of them. When control subjects could not see their bodies, they also pointed to the right. While control subjects improved when they were able to see their bodies, neglect subjects did not. When the horizontal line was moved toward the right, both neglect and control subjects increased their rightward pointing errors. However, patients with neglect made greater errors than did controls. When the line was in far left hemispace, controls pointed accurately to their midsagittal planes. The neglect subjects, in contrast, erred toward the left. Our results suggest that patients with neglect from right hemisphere lesions are not only inattentive to their bodies, but are also distracted by extracorporeal stimuli, especially on the right. Our results also suggest that normal subjects have a propensity to orient to or be distracted by stimuli in right hemispace.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Victor W. Mark, Department of Neurology, University of Maryland, 22 South Greene Street Baltimore MD 21201.

Presented in part at the 40th annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, Cincinnati, OH, April 1988.

Supported by the Medical Research Service of the Veterans Administration and the Pangborn Fund of the University of Maryland School of Medicine.

Received May 26, 1989. Accepted for publication in final form September 27, 1989.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
K. M. Heilman, Y. Jeong, and G. R. Finney
Spatial cognition
Neurology, December 14, 2004; 63(11): 1994 - 1996.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
U. Zimmer, J. Lewald, and H.-O. Karnath
Disturbed Sound Lateralization in Patients with Spatial Neglect
J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2003; 15(5): 694 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
S. Ferber and H.-O. Karnath
Parietal and occipital lobe contributions to perception of straight ahead orientation
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 1999; 67(5): 572 - 578.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.