Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kok, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Merx, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kok, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Merx, H.
NEUROLOGY 1985;35:1193
© 1985 American Academy of Neurology

Cerebrospinril fluid rhinorrhea during treatment with bromocriptine for prolactinoma

J. G. Kok, A. K. M. Bartelink, B. P. M. Schulte, A. Smals, G. Pieters, E. Meyer and H. Merx

Departments of Neurology (Drs. Kok and Schulte), Internal Medicine (Drs. Bartelink, Smals. and Pieters). Neurosurgery (Dr. Meyer). and Radiology (Dr. Merx), Radboud IJniversity Hospital, Nijmegen, Holland.

A 47-year-old man exhibited loss of libido and impotence in association with plasma hyperprolactinemia and a pituitary mass with downward extension of the tumor to the sphenoid sinus and to the suprasellar cisterns. Bromocriptine, 15 mg daily, reduced the hyperprolactinemia as well as tumor size. After 8 months on this therapy, the patient developed overt CSF liquorrhea. Five days after discontinuation of bromocriptine, the CSF rhinorrhea stopped, and when bromocriptine was given again 2 weeks later, CSF rhinorrhea returned within 3 days. We believe this phenomenon to be due to retraction of tumor by bromocriptine exposing a defect in the sella floor. Transient occurrence of CSF rhinorrhea can be considered as a consequence of tumor regression in patients on bromocriptine. The possibility of this complication, especially in patients with downward extension of tumor, should be noted.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Kok, Department of Neurology III, Fifth Floor, Radboud University Hospital. PO Box 9109. 6500 HB Nijrnegen, Holland.

Accepted for publication November 30, 1984.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. G. I. Suliman, A. Gurlek, J. V. Byrne, N. Sullivan, G. Thanabalasingham, S. Cudlip, O. Ansorge, and J. A. H. Wass
Nonsurgical Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea in Invasive Macroprolactinoma: Incidence, Radiological, and Clinicopathological Features
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2007; 92(10): 3829 - 3835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
M. P. Gillam, M. E. Molitch, G. Lombardi, and A. Colao
Advances in the Treatment of Prolactinomas
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2006; 27(5): 485 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
R. Wood, D. D Sandeman, M. L Gawne-Cain, and R. I G Holt
Meningitis four years after treatment of macroprolactinoma
J R Soc Med, January 10, 2002; 95(10): 501 - 502.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.