HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Correspondence: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Correspondence are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chambers, B. R. Articles by Norris, J. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chambers, B. R. Articles by Norris, J. W.

Clinical significance of asymptomatic neck bruits

MacLachlan Stroke Unit and the Department of Neurosciences, Sunnybrook Medical Centre and the University of Toronto, Canada.

The value of neck bruits as indicators of underlying carotid artery disease was assessed by correlating the results of carotid Doppler examination with auscultation in 336 patients with asymptomatic bruits. Also, the separate findings of auscultation by two physicians were compared for agreement in the quality and location of the bruits. Levels of agreement between the physicians in the clinical examination were acceptable for the presence and site of the neck bruits, but were unacceptable for the intensity, pitch, and duration. Unilateral bruits in the upper neck indicated underlying internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis detectable by carotid Doppler (greater than 35% stenosis) in 61%, whereas only 11% of patients with bruits localized to the supraclavicular area had ICA stenosis. "Silent" contralateral ICA stenosis was detected by Doppler in 28% of patients with unilateral cervical bruits. Bilateral cervical bruits were the most powerful predictors (76%) of underlying ICA stenosis detectable by Doppler. Neck bruits are valuable indicators of underlying carotid artery disease, but Doppler ultrasound examination adds significantly to clinical accuracy.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Norris, Sunnybrook Medical Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Canada M4N 3M5.

Accepted for publication September 27, 1984.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. P. Derdeyn and W. J. Powers Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerotic Disease Stroke, November 1, 1996; 27(11): 1944 - 1950. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. C. Kanter, C. H. Tegeler, L. A. Pearce, J. Weinberger, W. M. Feinberg, D. C. Anderson, C. R. Gomez, J. F. Rothrock, C. M. Helgason, and R. G. Hart Carotid Stenosis in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Relationship to Stroke in the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study Arch Intern Med, June 27, 1994; 154(12): 1372 - 1377. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J.-S. Sauve., A. Laupacis, T. Ostbye, B. Feagan, and D. L. Sackett Does This Patient Have a Clinically Important Carotid Bruit? JAMA, December 15, 1993; 270(23): 2843 - 2845. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. J. Ingall, D. Homer, J. P. Whisnant, H. L. Baker Jr, and W. M. O'Fallon Predictive Value of Carotid Bruit for Carotid Atherosclerosis Arch Neurol, April 1, 1989; 46(4): 418 - 422. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. T. Longstreth Jr, T. D. Koepsell, and G. van Belle Clinical Neuroepidemiology: I. Diagnosis Arch Neurol, October 1, 1987; 44(10): 1091 - 1099. [Abstract] [PDF]