Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gottlieb, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Penn, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gottlieb, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Penn, R. D.
NEUROLOGY 1985;35:699
© 1985 American Academy of Neurology

Evaluation of cervical stimulation for chronic treatment of spasticity

Gerald L. Gottlieb, PhD, Barbara M. Myklebust, MS, Dusan Stefoski, MD, Karl Groth, PhD, Jeffery Kroin, PhD and Richard D. Penn, MD

Departments of Physiology (Drs. Gottlieb and Kroin and Ms. Myklebust), Neurosurgery (Dr. Penn), and Neurology (Dr. Stefoski), Rush Medical Center, Chicago, IL; and the Neuro Division (Dr. Groth), Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN.

Electrical stimulation of the spinal cord (SCS) to reduce spasticity was evaluated in seven patients who, along with their physicians, perceived significant and prompt benefit from stimulation. In two 24-hour test periods, on or off stimulation, we used two independent methods of evaluation: quantitative measures of joint compliance and stretch reflexes, and a standardized neurologic examination. Neither method did better than chance in determining whether SCS was actually being received. Problems with the experimental protocol are discussed, but the results cannot be interpreted as supporting the efficacy of SCS as a treatment for spasticity.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Gottlieb, Department of Physiology, Rush Medical Center, 1753 West Congress Parkway, Chicago, IL 60612.

Supported by grants from Medtronic, Inc., The Foundation for Physical Therapy, NRSA HL07320, and NIH grants NS-15630 and NS-12877.

Accepted for publication September 10, 1984.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
A. L. Albright
Neurosurgical Treatment of Spasticity and Other Pediatric Movement Disorders
J Child Neurol, January 1, 2003; 18(1_suppl): S67 - S78.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
D. A. Gelber and P. B. Jozefczyk
Therapeutics in the Management of Spasticity
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 1999; 13(1): 5 - 14.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.