Neurology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correspondence:
Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Correspondence are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aminoff, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenblum, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aminoff, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenblum, M. L.
NEUROLOGY 1985;35:1514
© 1985 American Academy of Neurology

Electrophysiologic evaluation of lumbosacral radiculopathies

Electromyography, late responses, and somatosensory evoked potentials

Michael J. Aminoff, MD, Douglas S. Goodin, MD, Gareth J. Parry, MD, Nicholas M. Barbaro, MD, Philip R. Weinstein, MD and Mark L. Rosenblum, MD

From the Departments of Neurology (Drs. Aminoff, Goodin, and Parry) and Neurosurgery (Drs. Barbaro. Weinstein, and Rosenblurn), School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA.

We compared the diagnostic utility of EMG, F wave and H-reflex studies, and peroneal and dermatomal SEPs in evaluating 28 patients with clinically unequivocal L-5 or S-1 compressive root lesions. The single most useful electrophysiologic technique was EMG, which often provided evidence of denervation in a myotomal pattern when other electrophysiologic findings were normal. We found abnormal late responses in 14 patients, but always in association with EMG abnormalities. Peroneal-derived SEPs were always normal. Dermatomal SEPs confirmed the diagnosis in seven patients, including two in whom other electrophysiologic studies were normal.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Aminoff, Department of Neurology—794-M. University of California Medical Center, San Francisco, CA 94143.

Accepted for publication January 24, 1985.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
F. Weber
The diagnostic sensitivity of different F wave parameters
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 1998; 65(4): 535 - 540.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
S. Perlik, M. A. Fisher, D. V. Patel, and C. Slack
On the Usefulness of Somatosensory Evoked Responses for the Evaluation of Lower Back Pain
Arch Neurol, September 1, 1986; 43(9): 907 - 913.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.